With that said, it does add more in-camera sharpening and seems to expose better so it gives this image an unrealistic advantage over what is possible with the D800 image with similar processing (I’ll do that later in another review). The thumbnail above has a minor crop from the left side and two moles removed, but its otherwise a downsized version of the 100% unedited in-camera JPEG (which you can click to see).Ĭanon’s in-camera JPEG is certainly more satisfying to my eyes, and in this case gives me an image I could technically call done and do nothing else. If you click on the shot above you’ll see the unedited in-camera JPEG (6.2MB and 25.7MB for the RAW).
#EPSON PERFECTION 3200 SCANNER WHIRRING ISO#
Compared to the Canon 5D Mark IIIĬanon 5D Mark III 1/200 sec at f/11, ISO 100, 200mm, AWB, Handheldĭoing the same exact kind of shot (handheld) using my 5D Mark III and 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens, I got an equally impressive shot with better in-camera color in my opinion.
What I do have though is an impressive image that should print quite well even if I didn’t do another damn thing to it. Now I’m a Canon shooter so I wasn’t crazy with the out of camera color or exposure with the camera default settings, but those things are easily addressed when editing the RAW file in Capture NX2 or Photoshop. Here’s some screen grabs from 100% of this image: The thumbnail above has two moles removed, but its otherwise a downsized version of the 100% unedited in-camera JPEG (which you can click to see). If you click on the shot above you’ll see the unedited in-camera JPEG (13.3 MB and 72.9 MB for the RAW). Until I got this camera in the studio I was very underwhelmed and wondered what the fuss was about, but I must say in good light this thing is impressive. I haven’t done any sort of careful scientific review yet, but I did ask a model to come by my studio so I could snap off a few shots.
I finally got my hands on a Nikon D800 this week, and my business partner was kind enough to also send along a Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II lens.
0 kommentar(er)
